conversation is an engine

A lot can happen in a conversation

A Confederacy of Onces

with 6 comments

What could a national conversation look like?

Once upon a time mom and dad and kids gathered in the evening in front of the television to be entertained. This family, sitting patiently and expectantly, had three channels to choose from. Plus the boring public broadcast channel. Back when everyone watched the same variety show or mini-series or disruptive news special, national conversations occurred. Broadcasts that enraged or engaged would spur citizens to remark to each other. And since everyone watched the same channels, national conversations were born. So we talked about Selma or Vietnam or the moon landing or the most recent episode of “Roots.” Sometimes, not often, we talked about what was happening in Washington.

Before TV, radio did the same. Before that newspapers. Media has a way of spurring national conversations, though the attention lasts only so long, because the job of media is to immediately bring the next new thing. Day after day. That’s their revenue stream and business model.

Falls-2-06292015

When consolidated media ran the news business, it seemed to have more of a black and white/good or bad characteristic. With good guys and bad guys, a much better story emerged. And better stories sell more newspapers or generate better Nielsen ratings.

Social media removes some power from the established media. By hearing from different voices, context can be provided. Or not: Sometimes flame-throwing trolls dominate our inbox, just like on Fox News. The smart ones among us find ways to hear different voices, so we can see different ways to connect the dots. The rest of us relish getting riled with righteous rage by the people in our tribe who serve that function.

Lately for me and others, social media has connected dots and has turned a series of media one-offs into a bona-fide “thing.” Many find themselves paying attention and then cannot help but remark. Topics like the statistics around black deaths with police. It was blogs and tweets that explored nuance and connected the series of “onces” to show there is more—much more—than just a few one-offs. It was social media that kept the topic on the radar, not the established media.

Kerry Miller, on a recent The Daily Circuit, said she doesn’t like to use “national conversation” because it never happens. That is (I think she meant), national conversations never materialize. But I would argue that more and more often people are adding up the “one-offs” and putting them together in ways journalists and authorities had not predicted. It blindsided me that the Confederate flag flying over the South Carolina capital would prove a lightning rod. Gay marriage has taken the nation by storm right up to the point where it became the law of the land. And it was the call for statistics to be reported about deaths occurring in police custody. All of these have been explored by social media in detail.

All of this has proven fodder for national conversations. That is, new topics that we may never have dreamed we’d find ourselves talking about are now falling from our lips at the coffee bar or on the drive to work. And here is perhaps where today’s national conversation differs from those conversations mediated only by established media. Social media allows for nuance. It need not be black and white because we’re not selling newspapers here (some are, of course). But the nuanced voices are helping us talk without forcing one way or the other.

I see these conversations developing every day. And they move from online to offline to online again. I also see smart journalists from established media finding ways to bring in nuance at just the right time.

###

Image credit: Kirk Livingston

Advertisements

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I miss the old days you were talking about, when the press had the integrity to be objective about the news and didn’t preach to us with a hidden agenda.
    I’m really tired of the righteous rage on Fox News! They stir up the passions of people who don’t except others who are different from themselves. It’s going to tear our country appart! Even worse, the Murdoch Dynasty is foreign, they shouldn’t have so much power over us.

    Tracy Bezesky

    June 29, 2015 at 10:34 am

    • Honestly, there never were truly objective days. Objectivity really isn’t part of the human toolkit. My challenge with that post is to try to hear voices other than the ones I want to hear–the ones who say what I think already. That is very hard.

      kirkistan

      June 29, 2015 at 12:12 pm

      • But integrity in journalism meant trying to be objective. now we’re getting preached to and given only the side they want us to see, people watch only what they want to be told. We are unable to debate the issues because each side is getting only their side of the news. I think it’s why we are more polarized.

        Tracy Bezesky

        June 29, 2015 at 1:53 pm

      • You are right about each side getting only one side. And that is a sadness. I’m reminded of the advice to “seek first to understand” (Stephen Covey). Now more than ever we need people like that–and journalists like that.

        kirkistan

        June 29, 2015 at 3:20 pm

  2. I agree with Tracy. Some years ago, the news stopped being fact and started being opinion. But lots of people don’t realize that (such as people being brainwashed by Faux News). I think you raise a good point about openmindedness and about being open to hearing another viewpoint. It would be nice to see less anger and more coming together, more understanding. Nothing gets done at the he fringes, but only when we come to the middle. I’m probably not making much sense, but I enjoyed your photo and post.

    createarteveryday

    June 30, 2015 at 8:27 am

    • You are making sense. It seems like there should be a way to hold firmly to what we believe and yet not become polarized. Thanks for commenting.

      kirkistan

      June 30, 2015 at 9:15 am


But wait--what do you think? Tell me:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: