conversation is an engine

A lot can happen in a conversation

Montana!

with 10 comments

I’ve been inspired by photo blogs like Shoot Montana (now Run Toward the Light), Photography Journal Blog , Decaseconds | HDR Photography and retireediary (among others) to try make my mediocre photos a bit less mediocre.

Passing through Montana recently I shot this:

WorkOnSky-10192013

I tried some Photoshop jujutsu and came up with this:

WorkOnSky-10192013-2

I like the lower shot better, but maybe I went too far.

What do you think?

No matter which you prefer: Montana!

###

Image credit: Kirk LIvingston

Advertisements

Written by kirkistan

October 20, 2013 at 5:00 am

10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Thanks for the ping back and kind words! I like them both, but I’m also a sucker for dramatic skies and I think you’ve done a good job pulling out the details of the clouds in the second image.

    Sonya

    October 20, 2013 at 7:46 am

    • I think it was the dramatic skies that made me pull my camera out in the first place. Montana has no end of dramatic skies. Working at bringing out the clouds was my first goal and I’ve got lots of room to grow. Thanks for your comment!

      kirkistan

      October 20, 2013 at 9:05 am

      • If you use Photoshop, have you made friends with the Curves tool? (Layers, add Adjustment Layer, Curves) It gives you incredibly fine tuned control of shadows and highlights.

        Sonya

        October 20, 2013 at 9:33 am

      • I’ve not made friends with that tool. I like how you say that: my experience with Photoshop is to slowly begin to understand–tool-by-tool–what they can do. I’ll give it a look. Thanks.

        kirkistan

        October 20, 2013 at 9:36 am

  2. I like the lower one best. I also prefer the way the world looks to me through my sunglasses – colors are more vivid. That’s how your bottom photo looks to me 🙂

    dirofpr

    October 20, 2013 at 8:16 am

    • Agreed and thanks for the reply. As I compare the two, what I saw was something between them.

      kirkistan

      October 20, 2013 at 9:02 am

  3. […] The eye is tricky and perception is problematic: what I believe I saw was different from the photo I took and the photo I (clumsily) retouched. Which of the photos was real—or was real something entirely […]

  4. Thanks for the ping back, I appreciate it 🙂 I do prefer your second version. The grass is really nice there. I would have done the sky differently maybe, it looks a bit too purple on my monitor. That’s all a matter of opinion though. I’m thinking I would have just done a separate levels adjustment on just the sky. Montana is just beautiful!

    Photography Journal Blog

    October 21, 2013 at 8:25 am

    • No you are right: it was too purple on my monitor as well. I did a couple separate adjustments, and honestly I’m just learning the tools. Sonya (comment above) pointed me toward the Curves tool which I used briefly and (sort of) understood. Your work with saturation was inspiring as a beginning point. Thanks for visiting.

      kirkistan

      October 21, 2013 at 8:50 am


But wait--what do you think? Tell me:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: