conversation is an engine

A lot can happen in a conversation

Please Read Jonathan Sacks “The Dignity of Difference”

with 4 comments

How to Escape the Orbit of Xenophobia

There is so much good to say about Jonathan Sacks’ The Dignity of Difference: how he welcomes the stranger, how he shows the impact of considering everything as a marketplace endeavor (this approach does not end well: people and relationships don’t fit the calculus of the marketplace), how the work of covenant might well be the glue that binds a global culture together and helps us overcome our stunning differences (just like communities have for centuries).

I like that Sacks grabs texts from the Old Testament to reframe very modern difficulties, like how Abraham honored the stranger, which speaks to our own ambivalence about people different from us. But Sacks also draws on old Jewish wisdom and criticism to help put those stories into context. I like how he pits Plato against Moses and dispels the notion of dualism and the notion of perfect forms. In doing this, he has opened a way from the ivory tower where pure academics lives apart from the rest of life. I appreciate his examples of Jewish scholars who were also workers. Thinking and working should be intertwined, much like Matthew Crawford wrote about so successfully.

You may get the sense this is a wide-ranging book, and it is, though a delightful read at each step. All this material—and he does make it fit together—is in the service of helping the reader reconnect with the wonder of what we can learn from each other. Rabbi Sacks Jewishness is a vital piece of the puzzle: as someone from a tribe that famously wandered for a long time, he thinks his people are uniquely positioned to welcome our world’s current batch of strangers. He may be right about that. In Sack’s view, people of true, deep faith learn to value the faith of others, even as they hold to their own.9780826468505_p0_v1_s260x420-01082013

My one critique has to do with the other end of the Bible Sacks quotes from freely. I would offer that the mystery of the very Jewish Jesus who was also the Christ greatly enhances the story of tolerance and inquisitive curiosity Sacks seeks to tell. The apostle Paul, in one his letters to his friends in Corinth, talked about being an ambassador to any and all, representing to the any and all the reality of being in relationship with God. My take on Paul, with a nod to Lord Sacks, is that those compelled by the Christ have every reason in the world to both hold firmly to their faith in the Christ while simultaneously listening deeply to those around them.

Many of you will stop here and point out how firm faith is more often used as a battlement from which to sling arrows. I don’t deny that has happened. And I confess we’ve not done well in that approach. But faith in the Christ offers both solid ground and excellent motivation for listening, though this is not the kind of thing you hear from the outposts of conservatism.

If you have opportunity to read The Dignity of Difference—do it. It is challenging and a tasty intellectual meal, and possibly life-changing.

###

Advertisements

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Prior to your review I was unfamiliar with Rabbi sacks, but after reading your review I decided to purchase his most recent work on faith and science. Thanks for your efforts.

    Jason

    January 11, 2013 at 9:04 pm

    • Yeah! I really like his writing. Thanks for reading.

      kirkistan

      January 11, 2013 at 9:20 pm

  2. NOT to be condescending, but the only cultural group that has throughout time been mistreated repeatedly even until the present day is are those which aren’t of the Darker Skin Tones. Those of the Cain descendants, which are African or of Afro relationship.

    Why do you think that Jews are celebrated now, but event in Israel Africans are being mistreated due to their skin color.

    Extra

    April 17, 2013 at 1:23 pm

    • Thanks for reading and thanks for commenting. I’m guessing other groups of people would take issue with “only,” but isn’t that Sacks point: that we need to take into consideration all the sorts of different people around us. It seems to me Sacks shows a way forward.

      kirkistan

      April 17, 2013 at 10:26 pm


But wait--what do you think? Tell me:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: